Click These

Nikola Tesla Secret
$2.95 .Com at GoDaddy.com!
how to grow indoor cannabis Domain Registrations from just $3.98/Year

Do Visit!

Follow Me

Nikola Tesla Secret

Harry Reid and “Domestic Terrorists”, Free Megan Huntsman, Increasing Militarization Of Government

iadamwRKq41qdm

###

harry reid to all americans

Harry Reid Calls Cliven Bundy Supporters “Domestic Terrorists”

“I repeat: what happened there was domestic terrorism”

Senator Harry Reid has escalated the war of words over the Cliven Bundy dispute, sensationally labeling the Nevada cattle rancher’s supporters “domestic terrorists” during an event in Las Vegas today.

During a ‘Hashtags & Headlines’ event at the Paris Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas, Reid referred to Bundy supporters as “Nothing more than domestic terrorists,” adding, “I repeat: what happened there was domestic terrorism.”

Reid was referring to the stand off on Saturday in Bunkerville where Bundy supporters, some of whom were armed, forced Bureau of Land Management agents to back down and release around 380 head of cattle belonging to Bundy that had been seized over the course of the previous week.

Reid claimed that Bundy viewed the United States as a “foreign government,” while accusing his supporters of goading violence.

“There were hundreds, hundreds of people from around the country that came there,” Reid said. “They had sniper rifles in the freeway. They had weapons, automatic weapons. They had children lined up. They wanted to make sure they got hurt first … What if others tried the same thing?”

Despite Reid’s characterization of Bundy supporters as “domestic terrorists,” the only violence metered out during the dispute was when BLM agents tasered and assaulted Bundy supporters during an incident on April 9.

No matter where you stand on the Bundy issue, Reid’s characterization of American protesters as “domestic terrorists” is chilling and a massive backlash is almost certain to follow.

Read it all at Infowars.

terrorists_freedom_fighters

###

Super one from the great years of rock and roll.

###

Michael Bloomberg is Spending $50 Million to Stop NRA

Mayor Michael Bloomberg may not be mayor of NY anymore, but he hasn’t stopped trying to be a major political force. His latest adventure into trying to force his opinions on the rest of America is a frontal assault on the Second Amendment. He’s putting up $50 million to bring down the NRA and other pro-Second Amendment organizations.

In addition, former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Justice Stevens wants to add five words to the Second Amendment to bring it into conformity with his worldview. If Stevens had his way, the newly formulated Second Amendment would read:

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms when serving in the militia shall not be infringed.”

This is an admission that the Second Amendment did not limit ownership only to those who formally served in the military, otherwise, why the need to add “when serving in the militia”?

Moreover, it wouldn’t be much of a militia if those in the militia weren’t armed, so the addition of his proposed five words turns the Amendment into logical nonsense.

It also would mean that only criminals and the military would be armed.

If a president ever implemented martial law and never rescinded the order, the American people would be at the mercy of the military that would be a better armed criminal force who served at the pleasure of a dictator.

Read on HERE.

###

10245465

###

###

This woman exercised her right to abort her infants, and now she’s being unjustly persecuted

ht_megan_huntsman_blur_h_jt_140413_16x9_992

Someone get this printed on a t-shirt:

“Free Megan Huntsman!”

Slap it on a bumper sticker. Start the campaign.

Megan Huntsman — every bit the same sort of feminist hero as Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards or Abortion Martyr George Tiller – is being persecuted. Prosecuted and persecuted before our very eyes (in the year 2014!) all for allegedly making a choice. A difficult choice, mind you. An alleged choice that she must have grappled with torturously.

She considered her options and, in the end, came to the conclusion that she wasn’t ready to be a mother. So she terminated her post-birth fetuses — six of them — and put them in boxes in her garage, according to the charges.

Police say that Ms. Huntsman has admitted to conducting this medical procedure, and why shouldn’t she admit to it? Why shouldn’t she have the freedom to make decisions about her life and her body, and why shouldn’t society herald her bravery in doing so?

Now, it’s true that I am a man and so I have no right to form an opinion on whether a fetus ought to be suffocated, either in its pre or post-birth stage of development. We know that one cannot reach an objective conclusion unless one is emotionally tied to the issue at hand, which is why, according to the dictates of jurisprudence, every jury is stacked with people who’ve been personally victimized by whatever type of crime the defendant stands accused.

Be that as it may, I am also a modern, progressive, American (in the year 2014, for God’s sake!) and so I have dutifully formulated my ideology through the passive absorption of popular culture. This process can only bring one to the inescapable realization that the worth of a fetus, or “human being” as right wing propagandists and biologists might call it, really depends on the feelings of the unwilling host, or “mother” as rabid Republican loons might refer to her.

Melissa Harris-Perry said as much a few months ago, confidently declaring that life begins when the woman feels like it. Cecile Richards has, for her part, insisted that the issue of life is irrelevant to the matter entirely, and Obama famously professed that, although he has taken a position on abortion, the job of formulating a theory that would justify that position is really quite above his pay grade.

Read it all at Matt Walsh.

###

###

The Catastrophic Impact of a Chinese EMP Attack Upon America

Effective Immediately: France Bans All GMO Cultivation

Lois Lerner Playing the Victim Card

###

In Flagrante Delicto

inflagrante these nuts

###

Beware The Increasing Militarization Of Government

Federal Fire Power: Instead of putting a lien on the property of Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy, the Bureau of Land Management surrounded his ranch with 200 armed agents. It’s not the only agency with a private army.

Back in 2008, candidate Barack Obama slipped a little-noticed line in a speech, proposing a national police force reporting straight to him.

“We cannot continue to rely only on our military,” he said. “We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

As our military is slowly decimated by his policies and budget cuts — and with federal agencies armed to the teeth — we may be seeing what he had in mind at the ranch of a 67-year-old Nevadan.

Agents of a federal agency that many Americans were surprised to see so heavily armed even herded American citizens into “First Amendment zones,” another surprise to those who thought the Constitution made the entire U.S. such a zone.

“The government’s option,” said Fox News contributor and former Judge Andrew Napolitano, “is to take the amount of money (Bundy) owes them and docket it — that is, file the lien on his property. The federal government could have done that.

“Instead, they wanted this show of force. They swooped in . . . with assault rifles aimed and ready and stole this guy’s property, they stole his cattle. They didn’t have the right to do that. That’s theft, and they should have been arrested by state officials.”

The Environmental Protection Agency also has a private army. In late August 2013, armed EPA agents joined agents of the Alaska Environmental Crimes Task Force and swarmed gold mines near Chicken in the Last Frontier State.

More found HERE.

###

What Will You Do When You Can No Longer Buy Or Sell Without Submitting To Biometric Identification?

An Unnecessary Bank

18 Stats That Prove That Government Dependence Has Reached Epidemic Levels

###

This really is all they have to do. What with the liberals destroying our country day by day.

iadazw9u1qckp

Need for Having an Autoloading Rifle in the Closet, The True Opponents of Immigration Reform, OBAMA GESTAPO

iada18ip4EAt1r

My PSA for today.

###

Obama & Holder Demonstrate the Need for Having an Autoloading Rifle in the Closet

Government officials are only people, subject to all the infirmities and limitations involved with being human. Some are insane, others myopic, others power hungry, and a few are men and women of good purpose. The problem with government officials being fallible is that, in the case of the United States, 300 million people depend upon them always doing the right thing.

But government officials are fallible and not infrequently they are murderous. Hitler was. Stalin was. Mussolini was. Mao Zedong was. Idi Amin was. Pol Pot was. Hideki Tojo was. Leopold II of Belgium was. Kim Jong-ll was. Gadhafi was. Robert Mugabe was. Saddam Hussein was. And a hundred others were. In fact, Rudolph J. Rummel, author of “Death by Government,” estimated 170 million people have been murdered by their own governments in the 20th century.

This might lead a person of ordinary prudence to think what the founders of our country thought: it’s best not to concentrate too much power in the federal government. Hence, the Second Amendment.

But no logic, no history, no reasoned fear of overreaching can persuade a typical progressive that such malfeasance can happen here. “We will never be slaughtered by our own government,” they say.

If that is true, it is not because the people who run government are trustworthy. They are simply human beings, which, by definition, are not trustworthy. It could only be because those in government are constrained by checks and balances, the genius of our Constitution.

To a conservative, respectful as he or she may be to the Constitution, it is, nonetheless, too slender a reed to trust when lives are at stake. Best have an autoloading rifle in the closet to back up what we believe to be the constraint required of government.

To progressives, this is insane. Since the government will never kill its own people (pretend that Ruby Ridge, Waco, Benghazi and Fast and Furious never happened), one need not go to the extreme of owning firearms.

Fortunately, the Obama administration has resolved the dispute. In fact, Eric Holder, the Attorney General of the United States gives us the answer.

Holder is the first Attorney General of the United States to be held in contempt of Congress. On the face of it, this would seem to confirm that the system works; if one branch of government misbehaves, another branch will correct the misbehavior. Unfortunately, it doesn’t work that way.

Read all of this at Freedom Outpost.

###

dem 2014 platform

###

I see every day where facebook just willy nilly censors a picture or post and even eliminates an account. And all seem to be Christian, or conservative.

For the record, Facebook has the right to censor — it’s their company. And while they may censor conservative and Christian postings, Facebook is quite welcoming and affirming to leftwing diatribes against Republicans, religion and the Tea Party. I just wish the folks at Facebook were a bit more tolerant — and diverse.

###

Survey: Americans say no to robots as caretakers and meat grown in a lab .

Horrifying: Centipede tears through snake’s stomach .

Mars orbiter snaps Curiosity and tracks from far above .

New proposal may pave way for next generation of plastic computers r.

New Caseid Fossil Sheds Light on Ancient Carnivore’s Evolution into Plant-Eating Lifestyle .

###

Former Governor of Minnesota, professional wrestler, actor, US Navy SEAL Vietnam veteran, TV host, author, and all-around awesome guy Jesse Ventura has possibly his most intense conversation about government, violence, philosophy, and freedom. Then he calls himself a liberal? Which one is the unstoppable force, and which one is the immovable object?

###

The True Opponents of Immigration Reform

Too many special interests profit from the present mess.

Solving the illegal-immigration problem should not be hard. No one knows how many foreign nationals are residing illegally in the United States — estimates range from 11 million to 20 million. But everyone understands that it is an untenable situation that must be addressed.

The two extreme positions of the Left and Right probably have little public support — on the one hand, blanket amnesties and open borders, and on the other, deportation of all foreign nationals who reside here without legal authorization.

Polls show that most Americans want something in between.

Close the border. Allow entry only to those who have legal permission. Ensure that employers hire only those foreign nationals who have valid green cards. Permit those who have resided here for a while, who are without criminal records and are employed, to apply inside the U.S. for either a pathway to citizenship or legal residence.

Require that those residing here unlawfully pay a fine for breaking the law and wait in line until immigrants who followed the law are first processed. Reform legal immigration to make it ethnically blind and predicated on skill sets and education rather than on proximity to our borders or on family connections to those residing here unlawfully.

Most would agree with those sensible reforms, but I doubt that we will see any such grand bargain. The trouble is not, as the Democratic and Republican establishments allege, because of xenophobic and nativist bigots. Only a minority now favor sending every undocumented immigrant home without a chance for the hard-working and law-abiding to stay here while they apply for citizenship.

The problem instead is that the establishments of both parties talk in high-minded fashion but in fact act selfishly. Unfortunately, identity-politics elites and Democratic-party activists, along with employers of undocumented workers, do not support such a grand bargain.

Read on HERE.

###

nude sunbathing not for everyone

###

Al Sharpton Easter Message: Jesus Humiliated, Mocked Crucified, Rose – Barack Obama too.

CLINTON/OBAMA CRONIES BEHIND BUNDY SHOWDOWN

###

Campaign against the free practice of religion and respect for individual religious values has been in place since the election of President Obama

Christianity in Troubled Times

The vast ignorance of American history by far too many Americans is perhaps demonstrated in the failure to understand that it was the free practice of their interpretation of Christianity by the pilgrims that led to the creation of America. Plymouth colony, established in 1620, put the Atlantic Ocean between them and hostilities they had encountered in England.

To understand the role of religion in America, the First Amendment begins with a prohibition that the states shall make no law “respecting an establishment of religion…” The Founders wanted to make sure that neither the federal, nor state governments designated a particular religion as the only one. We can thank James Madison for that and the other enumerated freedoms.

Religious tolerance, which took some time to become fully established in the colonies and the new nation, has been a significant part of life in America—-a nation that has always been predominantly Christian. Easter should remind us of that.

As 2012 came to a close, the Pew Research Religion and Public Life Project offered the following numbers regarding the global population of Christians. They were determined to be approximately 2.2 billion worldwide. That’s about one-in-three (32%).

About half of all Christians are Catholic (50%) while an estimated 37% belong to the Protestant tradition. The Orthodox Communion, including the Greek and Russian Orthodox, make up 12% of Christians while those who belong to other branches such as Mormons, Christian Scientists, and Jehovah Witnesses, make up about 1% of the global population.

Though Christianity took root in the Middle East, less than 1% of Christians are found these days either there or in North Africa. The largest concentration is in Europe (26%), followed closely by Latin American and the Caribbean (24%), and sub-Saharan Africa (24%). Most Christians (87%) live in countries where Christians are in the majority. Of the 232 countries and territories in the Pew study, 157 had majorities, but most had relatively small populations.

What surely has to be a cause for concern in America are the results of a Harris poll released in December 2013. While a strong majority (74%) of U.S. adults said they believe in God, the figure was down from 82% in earlier years. Belief in miracles, heaven, and other religious teachings were all in decline.

For Christians, 68% expressed a belief that Jesus is God or the Son of God, down from 72%. Belief in the resurrection of Jesus Christ (65%) was down from 72% ten years earlier.

Much more HERE.

###

iadaU5sU1s3sc

###

Back Any Candidate You Want as Long as It’s One of These Three

New Atheist Banner: If There is No God There are No Sins (or Crimes)

###

Outrage!! OBAMA GESTAPO PLANS LARGEST LAND GRAB IN HISTORY OF THE WORLD!

569-epa-nazi-obama-mccarthy-rick-wells-610

The EPA is in the process, right this very minute, of seizing control over all private land in the United States. They are following the United Nations blueprint, their minion Gina McCarthy is implementing it, and B. Hussein Obama is facilitating it.

Anywhere in America where it rains or where water collects or through which water moves will now, according to this new rule change they are implementing, be under their control. Not because Congress or the people give them that authority or jurisdiction, but simply because they are seizing the power. It is just another component of the illegitimate tyranny which is oppressing the American people.

On Tuesday the agency which operates as the misnamed Environmental Protection Agency unveiled their proposed change to the Clean Water Act, which would extend their regulatory control to temporary wetlands and waterways.

This definition consists of any water, including seasonal ponds, streams, runoff and collection areas and irrigation water. It could include runoff from watering your lawn, or puddles on your own property. They will control the presence of and can prohibit through regulation, your right to the water and your actions regarding water upon your own land. The opportunities for their abuse would be limitless.

Louisiana Senator David Vitter, the ranking Republican on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, offered an understated precautionary objection stating, “The … rule may be one of the most significant private property grabs in U.S. history.”

The EPA proposal would extend their authority to include “pollution regulations” to “intermittent and ephemeral streams and wetlands” – which are created temporarily during wet seasons or following rainfall.

Recognize this for what it is America; The EPA is giving themselves legal jurisdiction to replace our rights with their permissions anywhere it rains or water exists.

They are expanding the same kind of California fish-based drought or Nevada tortoise land restrictions or Oregon spotted owl tyranny to every square inch of the United States.

The EPA is asserting that all ground water, whether temporary or not and regardless of size is part of the “waters of the United States.”

Their position is in contradiction to the Supreme Court rulings in 2001 and 2006, restricting the EPA to flowing and sizeable, “relatively” permanent bodies of water such as “oceans, rivers, streams and lakes.” Of course, progressives just keep trying until they get what they want, and they never have enough.

The proposed rule change is now in a 90 day comment period during which they will assess just how much they can get away with, based upon public outcry and pushback.

Senator Vitter accused the EPA of “picking and choosing” their science and of attempting to “take another step toward outright permitting authority over virtually any wet area in the country.” He also warned that if approved, more private owners could expect to be sued by “environmental groups.”

Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) shares Vitter’s concerns, warning of potential economic damage and questioning the EPA’s motivations.

She said, “[I]t appears that the EPA is seeking to dramatically expand its jurisdictional reach under the Clean Water Act. If EPA is not careful, this rule could effectively give the federal government control of nearly all of our state.

Of course, that is exactly what they are after, as well as 49 other states and territories.

From HERE.

###

Swearnet_D20_247.nef

We are very fucking proud to present the trailer for SWEARNET: THE MOVIE – the funniest, sweariest, most fucked-up movie you will ever fucking see!

Check the trailer out here!

(It’s SO outrageous you might want to remove small children, grandmothers, pets, and people of a nervous fucking disposition from the room before you watch it… then prepare to LAUGH YOUR ASS OFF!!)SWEARNET: THE MOVIE hits Canadian theatres 22 August, and will also be available on Netflix at a later date.)