HUD Will Force Illegal Immigrants on Neighborhoods



LaRaza and other far-left groups are strongly backing a rule that will take effect in October which will likely end up forcing towns and cities to accept illegal immigrants among other “protected” classes of people.

Barack Obama is a believer in social engineering. This rule will give him the power to redistribute illegal immigrants, drug addicts, criminals, everyone who fits into a “protected class” according to the government’s definition throughout every neighborhood in the country and do it according to racial quotas.

LaRaza said that “Hispanic families often do not know their housing rights and have cited fear of deportation as reason for not reporting rights violations.” The majority of people who fear deportation are illegal, unskilled, poor, welfare recipients and they are coming into this country in the hundreds of thousands each month.

The housing rule passed July, 2013 ties government zoning rules to HUD grants and it opens communities up to lawsuits if they refuse their quota.

Every town and city that accepts federal block grants through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development will necessarily abide by the rule change to the Fair Housing Act of 1968 passed in 2013.

Any town or city taking grants, starting in October, will see HUD come in and rezone entire areas that do not include enough affordable housing according to their standards and according to who they define as “protected classes” of people. Packets have already been forwarded to grant recipients.

The grants are a Trojan Horse.

The federal government – HUD – will influence zoning laws by providing set standards, guidelines, and goals to “measure” and “assess” how well a community is meeting its Fair Housing obligations. It works in conjunction with Obama’s neighborhood mapping and his ultimate goal of redistributing all the resources in every neighborhood in the United States.

HUD is mapping every neighborhood in the United States, providing details of the access minorities have to resources in stronger neighborhoods. This information will then be used to redistribute investments and resources.

HUD’s fair housing regulation is aimed at helping communities understand “fair housing barriers” and to “establish clear goals” for “improving integrated living patterns and overcoming historic patterns of segregation.

HUD plans to provide data for every neighborhood in the country listing the access minorities have to local assets such as schools, jobs, transportation,and other neighborhood resources that help bring people into the middle class.

They want to provide “fair” housing for all.

HUD will develop long-term solutions to help “people gain access to different neighborhoods,”…”channeling investments into under-served areas.” The mapping tool may guide development and zoning decisions as one example.

It’s affirmative action for housing. They even call it the “Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule”. The only problem is affirmative action was always reserved for Blacks whose ancestors were slaves in this country. The people who will benefit now are illegal immigrants, many are criminals – as many as 25% are lawbreakers according to The Center for Immigration Research. Every one of them broke the law coming into this country and now we will redistribute the wealth of our neighborhoods to them.

It is an outright attack on the suburbs as Rep. Gosar recently said. He also said to expect racial quotas.

Obama has given out $3.8 billion in grants to date to 1200 municipalities. They will all be subject to zoning changes and the consequent redistribution.

There is an amendment to the Transportation HUD and Related Agencies Act of 2015 added by Rep. Gosar (R-AZ) to keep HUD from implementing the rule but the Democratic Senate will keep their version of the bill, presented by Mike Lee, from passing.

HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan said, “Make no mistake, this is a big deal. “With the HUD budget alone, we are talking about billions of dollars. And as you know, decades ago, these funds were used to support discrimination. Now, they will be used to expand opportunity and bring communities closer to the American Dream.”

The government wants to determine how neighborhoods grow and who benefits.

After all, you didn’t build that and spreading the wealth is good for everyone.

Remember what Barack Obama told Joe the Plumber?

“It’s not that I want to punish your success. I just want to make sure that everybody who is behind you, that they’ve got a chance at success, too… My attitude is that if the economy’s good for folks from the bottom up, it’s gonna be good for everybody. If you’ve got a plumbing business, you’re gonna be better off [...] if you’ve got a whole bunch of customers who can afford to hire you, and right now everybody’s so pinched that business is bad for everybody and I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”

This will turn into a massive social justice plan to establish economic equality of all members of society no matter who earns it. Social justice requires the government collect the peoples’ money and distribute it evenly to everyone.

Obama believes that money is collective money and the government is in the best position to manage and distribute it.

Socialism is a system of social organization in which private property and the distribution of income are subject to social control; also, the political movements aimed at putting that system into practice. Obama is probably beyond socialism but this is the least of it.

Barack Obama was very clear about his intentions in 1998. Check out the video.

Found at the Independent Sentinel.



American cable channels have blended into an indistinguishable swamp of reality TV

The Strange Story Of How Rhode Island Accidentally Legalized Prostitution

Climate Flees The Arctic And Moves To California




Policing America

I want the police to be better armed than the bad guys, but what exactly does that mean today?

Apparently it means the Pentagon and Department of Homeland Security equip even the tiniest rural police departments with massive military vehicles, body armor and grenade launchers. The equipment is surplus from the long wars we fought in Iraq and Afghanistan.

To a hammer, everything resembles a nail. SWAT (Special Weapons and Tactics) teams were once used only in emergencies such as riots or robberies where hostages were taken. But today there are more than 50,000 “no-knock raids” a year.

It’s not because crime got worse. There is less crime today. Crime peaked around 1990 and is now at a 40-year low. But as politicians keep passing new criminal laws, police find new reasons to deploy their heavy equipment.

Washington Post reporter Radley Balko points out that they’ve used SWAT teams to raid such threatening haunts as truck stops with video poker machines, unlicensed barber shops and a frat house where underage drinking was reported.

In New York City, these men in black raided standup comedian Joe Lipari’s apartment.

“I had bad customer service at the Apple Store,” Lipari told me in an interview for my upcoming TV special “Policing America.” “So I bitched about it on Facebook. I thought I was funny. I quoted ‘Fight Club,’” the 1999 movie about bored yuppies who attack parts of consumer culture they hate.

“People (on Facebook) were immediately responding that it was obviously from ‘Fight Club,’” says Lipari. “It was a good time, until 90 minutes later, a SWAT team knocked on my door. Everyone’s got their guns drawn.”

It took only that long for authorities to deem Lipari a threat and authorize a raid by a dozen armed men. Yet, says Lipari, “if they took 90 seconds to Google me, they would have seen I’m teaching a yoga class in an hour, that I had a comedy show.”

Read it all HERE.



Iraqi Kurdish oil may finally be freely for sale as the US seems to be dropping its threats

Luxury Cars Seized Can Be a Civil Liberties Issue


Research compares food-safety inspection scores of food trucks, food carts and restaurants in seven major American cities—and finds that street eats are safe eats.


Tim Tebow, Michael Sam, and the NFL ‘Distraction’ Double Standard

Daniel J. Flynn — It’s hard to respect a cry for any right that comes at the expense of the right to vote (Massachusetts gay marriage), the right to free speech (Craig James), and the right to pursue a living (Brendan Eich). Similarly, taking seriously charges of bigotry from those embodying its definition—narrow-minded people reflexively intolerant towards difference—is to not take oneself seriously. One of the great magic tricks of the age involves the incessant use of “bigot” to mask one’s own bigotry. They demand tolerance, diversity, and civility. They demonstrate the opposite.

Seattle Seahawks head coach Pete Carroll called Tim Tebow a “distraction” for the New York Jets in 2012. Then Jacksonville Jaguars head coach Mike Mularkey labeled Tebow a “distraction.” Even outgoing Jets special teams coach Mike Westoff tagged Tebow a—you guessed it—“distraction.”

Nobody called them bigots (or even unoriginal) for this opinion. Nobody demanded that their employers terminate them. Nobody attacked their dead relatives. Observers of the ultimate team sport, in which we don’t even get a clear look at the faces of the competitors during games, just concluded that standard operating procedure in the NFL involves a fixation on football.

Michael Sam deserves a roster shot just as Tim Tebow deserves a roster spot. Let them play. But understand that what makes them attractive to their respective fan bases makes them repulsive to the coaching fraternity. Field generals are about football. Sam wins fans because of who he sleeps with and Tebow inspires devotion because of his other Sunday activity.

Read the full article at


Harry Reid porn…