Islamification of the Christian Bible!

This is truly a what the fuck is wrong here? When the BIBLE is islamified so as not to offend dumbshit muslims….

(Yahoo! News) — A controversy is brewing over three reputable Christian organizations, which are based in North America, whose efforts have ousted the words “Father” and “Son” from new Bibles. Wycliffe Bible Translators, Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL) and Frontiers are under fire for “producing Bibles that remove “Father,” “Son” and “Son of God” because these terms are offensive to Muslims.”

Concerned Christian missionaries, Bible translators, pastors, and national church leaders have come together with a public petition to stop these organizations. They claim a public petition is their last recourse because meetings with these organizations’ leaders, staff resignations over this issue and criticism and appeals from native national Christians concerned about the translations “have failed to persuade these agencies to retain “Father” and “Son” in the text of all their translations.”

Biblical Missiology, a ministry of Boulder, Colorado-based Horizon International, is sponsoring the petition.

The main issues of this controversy surround new Arabic and Turkish translations. Here are three examples native speakers give:

First, Wycliffe and SIL have produced Stories of the Prophets, an Arabic Bible that uses an Arabic equivalent of “Lord” instead of “Father” and “Messiah” instead of “Son.”

Second, Frontiers and SIL have produced Meaning of the Gospel of Christ , an Arabic translation which removes “Father” in reference to God and replaces it with “Allah,” and removes or redefines “Son.” For example, the verse which Christians use to justify going all over the world to make disciples, thus fulfilling the Great Commission (Matthew 28:19) reads, “Cleanse them by water in the name of Allah, his Messiahand his Holy Spirit” instead of “baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” Rev. Bassam Madany, an Arab American who runs Middle East Resources, terms these organization’s efforts as “a western imperialistic attempt that’s inspired by cultural anthropology, and not by biblical theology.”

(there are too many fucking idiotic liberal assholes trying like hell to make everything nicey-nice for the dirtbag muslims!)


Senate Republicans say they have the congressional authority to circumvent President Barack Obama and give the green light to begin construction on the Keystone XL Pipeline project.

Nearly half of the Senate, 44 lawmakers, signed on to legislation Monday to authorize TransCanada to begin work on the pipeline that would stretch from Alberta, Canada to the Gulf Coast and transport 830,000 barrels of oil a day to U.S. refineries.

The lawmakers say they have that authority under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, and cited an opinion from the Congressional Research Service confirming their authority to approve the project.

“The president said recently that he was for an all-of-the-above approach to energy, yet he rejected the one bipartisan energy project that is shovel-ready and can produce thousands of new jobs almost immediately – the Keystone XL Pipeline,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R. –KY). “While it’s clear that the president was appealing to his liberal environmental base when he blocked Keystone, this legislation would move us towards the creation of thousands of jobs and energy security for our nation.”


Added Sen. Lugar: “The President has failed to lead but we will not stop trying to complete this critical supply line.”

Read the article here.

Well, now. Isn’t that special. I just wonder where this will lead? Who are the 44 Senators backing this? How many are Democrats? The article says: “Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia is the sole Democrat cosponsoring the measure.”

Will the rest of the Democrats join the Republicans to actually get this approved? Will they dare cross their messiah? And if they do, what will Obama do? Will this be the push that Obama will use to disband congress entirely?

You know he wants to…


One would think that the Occupy movement and San Francisco were made for each other. Perhaps at one time they were, but a new Survey USA poll shows that even the City by the Bay has its limits. The poll of 500 adults in the San Francisco area — surely the most progressive-friendly poll sample ever taken — shows that almost half of those who supported the Occupy movement in general now have changed their minds. [...]

According to this poll, Occupy support in the Bay area would have been 58/34 at one point. Now it’s 35/57, which is a flip of 46 points in the gap. Combining support and opposition numbers, Democrat support for Occupy is now 40/56, and even among self-professed liberals, where 27% have switched to opposition, it’s only 52/35. Among San Francisco adults. Note too that the movement has not gained converts in anything like the numbers they are alienating, which means that the longer they go, the weaker they are getting politically.

Keep reading…

(reports that princess pelosi went crying to king obama about this survey)


(The Hill) — The Congressional Budget Office on Tuesday predicted the budget deficit will rise to $1.08 trillion in 2012.

CBO also projected the jobless rate would rise to 8.9 percent by the end of 2012, and to 9.2 percent in 2013.

These are much dimmer forecasts than in CBO’s last report in August, when the office projected a $973 billion deficit. The report reflects weaker corporate tax revenue and the extension for two months of the payroll tax holiday.

A rising deficit and unemployment rate would hamper President Obama’s reelection effort, which in recent weeks has seemed to be on stronger footing.

If the CBO estimate is correct, it would mean that the United States recorded a deficit of more than $1 trillion for every year of Obama’s first term.

The deficit was $1.4 trillion in 2009, $1.3 trillion in 2010 and $1.3 trillion in 2011. The largest deficit recorded before that was $458 billion in 2008.

(we can not take 4 years of obamashit, nor the liberals running our government)


OAKLAND (KCBS) — Oakland Mayor Jean Quan said she has had it with a small, violent fringe element within the Occupy Oakland protests and claimed it is using the city as a “playground.”

Quan spoke Monday in an interview following another chaotic round of street protests in which police units from surrounding areas were on hand to support the cash-strapped city’s police department.

“They’re taking away resources from my city and creating a situation where it’s making it more difficult for me to keep the city safer,” Quan said.

(wait, this mayor is a liberal and embraced the occupiers at the start, now she is not too happy with them?)


“The Obama administration has just told the Catholics of the United States, ‘To Hell with you!’ There is no other way to put it. To Hell with your religious beliefs. To Hell with your religious liberty. To Hell with your freedom of conscience.”

With unusually strong language, Bishop David Zubik of Pittsburgh alerted his flock to a new threat to the Church.

The Obama administration has directly and deliberately attacked our fundamental right to religious freedom, and in a most patronizing way. His Department of Health and Human Services has mandated that contraceptives and abortion inducing drugs be part of every health care plan, free of charge. With this decision, Catholics and Catholic institutions such as hospitals, universities and social agencies will be forced to pay for and provide contraception, sterilization and abortifacient drugs.

Keep reading…

(next obama and his islamic buddies will force the Catholic Church and other Christian churches and schools to accept ragheads!)


Rand Paul: Obama prone to ‘lawless and unconstitutional’ behavior

Hoyer: GOP’s federal pay-freeze bill is ‘not justified’

RNC: “Interesting”  Obama really is in his own world!

Dems Defend Holder From Fast And Furious Criticism

CBO Report Says Real Unemployment Rate At 10%