Big Journolism

A batch of new polls released this week confirmed the Democrats’s worst nightmare: the majority of Americans strongly disapprove of the way in which the President is handling the economy and gas prices. The findings were a blow to a party that for weeks has pandered to women with the trumped-up bogeyman of an all-white male Republican party who wanted to gobble up all their birth control pills. The fabricated War on Women failed, and failed hard. Not ones to give up easily, Senators Schumer and Leahy devised another tactic: playing checkers with the Violence Against Women Act.

The reauthorization of the VAWA is unanimously approved every year since the it was passed in 1994; the latest reauthorization was in 2006. This year there is resistance and Democrats are anxious to exploit the resistance from Republicans. Why is the GOP resisting? The language of the VAWA has remained the same throughout both Republican and Democrat congresses, except now. Senate Republicans sent out this alert:

The VAWA was originally passed in 1994 and has remained in effect through both Republican Democrat Congresses.  On March 12,  2012,  the Judiciary Committee voted on the reauthorization of S. 1925 the Violence Against Women Act,  introduced by Senator Leahy. Unlike the last reauthorization of VAWA in 2006,  which passed  by unanimous consent,  S. 1925 contained provisions that had never appeared in past authorizations of VAWA.  For these reasons,  Sen. Grassley,  the Ranking Member,  offered a Republican substitute amendment to the Leahy bill.  Republicans voted for the Grassley substitute Democrats for the new Leahy version.  The new Leahy version passed through committee,  but Democrats chose not to schedule it for a vote.


The Leahy bill contains a number of new controversial immigration provisions.  For example,  it expanded eligibility for and increased the number of visas available to certain individuals (whether in the U.S. or a foreign country) who may be helpful in the investigation of a crime.  However,  as the law is currently written,  this visa category is subject to rampant fraud and misuse, e.g.,  sham marriages; false allegations of a crime.  The Grassley substitute contained fraud-prevention measures.  The Leahy bill also eliminated the requirement making these visa applicants ineligible for admission if they would become a public charge upon entry in the U.S.  The Grassley substitute did not contain this new provision.


Tomorrow is St. Patrick’s day. Wear green even if you are not Irish. Eat corned beef and drink green beer. Oh, and wear a shamrock.


Now this is something to think about.

How come, since Obama got voted in as our president. one does not see anti-war protestors?

Did the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan become good wars for the anti-war people?

Or was it the fact that Bush was no longer president?

Or maybe all those anti-war protestors during the Bush years were paid by the left to protest? And they really could have cared less about our men and women in harms way?



Patriot Update

Thanks to an awesome website called, I was able to compile a little comparison between what Barack Obama says and what the actual truth is.

Obama says: “When special interests put their thumb on the scale, and distort the free market, the people who compete by the rules come in last.” Barack Obama, speech, Aug. 2, 2008

Reality: Knock, knock. Who’s there? OBAMACARE! What—in the history of America’s free market system—has more blatantly distorted that system than Obamacare, in which everyone is forced to comply with government-controlled healthcare or they will pay hefty fines or worse? The ONLY word for this is Socialism and it hasn’t worked for the UK, Canada or anywhere else in the universe. Never has, never will…

Obama says:  The 2nd Amendment is good! “I believe in the Second Amendment. It does provide for Americans the right to bear arms for their protection, for their safety, for hunting, for a wide range of uses. That does not mean that we cannot constrain gun runners from shipping guns into Mexico.”

Reality:  Not so much. People in the know believe Fast & Furious was entirely a 2nd Amendment thing.  Obama has also said, “I believe in keeping guns out of our inner cities, and that our leaders must say so in the face of the gun manufacturer’s lobby.”  Barack Obama, The Audacity of Hope

Obama says:  He cares about our military. “When we send our young men and women into harm’s way, we have a solemn obligation not to fudge the numbers or shade the truth about why they’re going, to care for their families while they’re gone, to tend to the soldiers upon their return, and to never ever go to war without enough troops to win the war, secure the peace, and earn the respect of the world.”  Barack Obama, speech at 2004 Democratic Convention

Reality: Barack Obama plans to cut $17 billion out of our military budget.  Also as of February 1, 2012 COMBAT PAY has been cut for many in the military.


Wonder how long this guy drove before he found out he really did hit a deer?


Big Government

There is a new street art poster that’s being emailed around and will no doubt eventually be spotted on a street corner near you. It’s a gritty black and white image of Andrew Breitbart looking both battle-worn and ever vigilant with the caption: “BREITBART IS HERE.”

Those three words express the instant connection many of us feel for our fallen friend. They express our identification with him, and our need to continue his fight for the good of our republic.

With the death of Breitbart, the conservative movement didn’t just lose a General – we lost an entire Special Forces Division. But he didn’t leave us without the tools and the knowledge we need to fight. This website – Breitbart 2.0 – is the culmination of his study of the technology and aesthetics of new media. The team Breitbart assembled under the leadership of Steve Bannon, Larry Solov, and Joel Pollak will advance his mission with courage and integrity.

Breitbart’s most immediate mission was the belated vetting of Barack Obama. This obviously is an issue very near and dear to my heart.


Surely there is a weird story involved? Or just cops moving another occupier?


Another feel good story. While the liberals can not point to a single Tea Partier arrested for any reason, more liberal union goons arrested, tried and convicted.

The video below does a good job of laying out the story, so I won’t bore you by repeating details. But what I will say is this: the protesters were eventually found guilty ($200 fine plus court costs), and just wait until you hear their defense.

In a nutshell, the protesters claim that when police told the group to vacate the building because it was closing, the cops never told each one individually. They also believe that police would have been able to do their job (close the capitol) even if the protesters were left to sit in the rotunda. The money line comes when one of them claims he would have eventually gotten bored and left.

In Wisconsin.


From LifeNews

A pro-abortion activist writing at one of the leading pro-abortion websites is admitting what many in the pro-life movement has always known but what leading  defenders of abortion refuse to admit. Until now.

Jessica DelBalzo, an activist writer from Flemington, New Jersey who has written for numerous progressive websites, puts her extreme pro-abortion views on display at RH Reality Check, where she candidly admits in a headline, “I Love Abortion: Implying Otherwise Accomplishes Nothing for Women’s Rights.”

Read more at Lifenews

From RH Reality Check

I love abortion. I don’t accept it. I don’t view it as a necessary evil. I embrace it. I donate to abortion funds. I write about how

important it is to make sure that every woman has access to safe, legal abortion services. I have bumper stickers and buttons and t-shirts proclaiming my support for reproductive freedom. I love abortion.

And I bristle every time a fellow activist uses a trendy catch-phrase or rallying cry meant to placate pro-lifers. The first of these, “Make abortion safe, legal, and rare!” has been used for decades as a call for abortion rights.

Safe and legal are concepts I fully support, but rare is something I cannot abide. I understand the theoretical mindset: it is better for a woman to prevent an unwanted pregnancy than to bear the physical and financial burden of an abortion. While my own abortion involved very little pain and a minimal financial expense, one which my ex-boyfriend was willing to share with me, even I can admit that using condoms or the pill is preferable to eight weeks of nausea and weight gain. Contraception is a valuable tool.


However, there is no need to suggest that abortion be rare. To say so implies a value judgement, promoting the idea that abortion is somehow distasteful or immoral and should be avoided. Even with affordable, accessible birth control, there will be user errors, condoms that break, moments of spontaneity. The best contraceptive access in the world won’t change the fact that we are merely human and imperfect in our routines. The best access in the world also won’t change the fact that some women are raped, while others find that even wanted pregnancies sometimes need to be terminated for the woman’s well-being or to avoid birthing a child with painful or unmanageable disabilities. Women who find themselves facing any of these situations shouldn’t feel guilty for failing to keep the numbers low.

Read More


A guy sticks his head in the barber shop and asks, “How long before I can get a haircut?” The barber looks around the shop and says, “About two hours.” The guy leaves.

A few days later, the same guy sticks his head in the door and asks, “How long before I get a haircut?” The barber looks around the shop full of customers and says, “About two hours.” The guy leaves.

A week later, the same guy sticks his head in the shop and asks, “How long before I can get a haircut?” The barber looks around the shop an says, “About an hour and half.” The guy leaves.

The barber looks over at a friend in the shop and says, “Hey Bill, follow that guy and see where he goes.”

In a little while, Bill comes back into the shop laughing hysterically. The barber asks, “Bill, where did he go when he left here?” Bill looked up and said, “To your house.”


Nah, nothing creepy about this.

Via Politico:

President Barack Obama wants companies such as Google and Facebook to reform their privacy practices.

But that’s not stopping his re-election campaign from tapping the rich data Internet companies hold on millions of potential voters.

Obama for America has already invested millions of dollars in sophisticated Internet messaging, marketing and fundraising efforts that rely on personal data sometimes offered up voluntarily — like posts on a Facebook page— but sometimes not.

And according to a campaign official and former Obama staffer, the campaign’s Chicago-based headquarters has built a centralized digital database of information about millions of potential Obama voters.

It all means Obama is finding it easier than ever to merge offline data, such as voter files and information purchased from data brokers, with online information to target people with messages that may appeal to their personal tastes. Privacy advocates say it’s just the sort of digital snooping that his new privacy project is supposed to discourage.


Just a girl and her car….