First Daughter Story is Pulled, Big Mystery

Posted earlier about Malia Obama, the president’s 13 year old daughter, on spring break in Mexico. So the story is pulled by many online, and the mystery is why?

What’s up with the disappearing internet news reports Barack Obama’s 13-yr-old daughter Malia Ann Obama is on ‘Spring Break’ in Mexico? So far, Huffington Post, AFP, and U.K.’s Telegraph yanked their internet news reports of Malia Obama’s Mexico ‘Spring Break’ from their websites; a school trip to Oaxaca accompanied by Secret Service agents.

Why were the news reports yanked?

Who ordered them removed?

Were the reports removed for ‘security’ reasons?

Huffington Post, AFP and The Telegraph removed their reports the day after Mexican internet news sites filed reports with photos of Malia in Mexico. The cat’s out of the bag so why the censorship on this side of the border?

Link to Mexico website Quien who filed a report on Obama’s daughter in Mexico and posted more photos.



This is freaking awesome! Watermelons blasted by a 50 caliber machine gun.


Now gag on this story! YUCK is all I can say!

Mystical elixir: Carrie is a 53-year-old woman who drinks her own pee as well as brushing her teeth with it

‘I like warm pee – it’s comforting’: Meet the woman who drinks and bathes in her urine


Carrie is a 53-year-old cancer victim who according to her friend has ‘done some strange stuff over the years’. But this may be the strangest of all.

The middle-aged brunette from Colorado Springs has taken to drinking her own urine, a four-year-old, five-glass-a-day habit that she calls ‘comforting’.

On TLC’s finale of the shocking series, My Strange Addiction, Carrie explains that drinking the warm pee for the first time didn’t make her throw up so she decided: ‘You know what, I can do this.’



We can give up on the Brits. Soon, there will be no more Brits, just islamic slime.

I believe it already is. See: Londonistan.

Via Telegraph:

Here is the full version of a story which appears in the print edition of today’s Daily Telegraph:

Ken Livingstone has promised to turn London into a “beacon” for the words of the Prophet Mohammed in a sermon at one of the capital’s most controversial mosques.

Mr Livingstone, Labour’s candidate for mayor of London, pledged to “educate the mass of Londoners” in Islam, saying:  “That will help to cement our city as a beacon that demonstrates the meaning of the words of the Prophet.” Mr Livingstone described Mohammed’s words in his last sermon as “an agenda for all humanity.”

He praised the Prophet’s last sermon, telling his audience: “I want to spend the next four years making sure that every non-Muslim in London knows and understands [its] words and message.” He also promised to “make your life a bit easier financially.”

Mr Livingstone was speaking at last Friday’s Jummah prayer at the North London Central Mosque, also known as Finsbury Park Mosque, formerly controlled by the terrorist recruiter Abu Hamza.

Hamza was removed in 2003 but the mosque is now controlled by an Islamist organisation, the Muslim Association of Britain, which has been linked to the banned terror group, Hamas. A man who has acted as spokesman for the current leadership, Azzam Tamimi, is on record as supporting suicide bombings. One of the mosque’s current directors, Mohammed Sawalha, is described by the BBC as a former senior figure in Hamas who “is said to have masterminded much of Hamas’s political and military strategy” from his post in London.


Pat Condell once again tells the bare naked truth about Islam that desperately needs to be heard, that must be heard.



Well, seems blacks (at least those of this poll) want Obama in power more than whites as they seem to actually believe his lies!

Via The Hill:

Half of likely voters expect the Supreme Court to strike down President Obama’s signature healthcare law, and strong majorities see other major policies coming from the White House making life more difficult for themselves and the country, according to this week’s The Hill Poll.

On economic issues, 62 percent of voters say Obama’s policies will increase the debt, while 25 percent think they will cut it, and by a 48-percent-to-38-percent margin, voters believe those policies will increase joblessness rather than put people back to work.

On energy, 58 percent say Obama’s policies will result in gasoline prices increasing, while just 20 percent expect them to cut prices — and by a 46-percent-to-36-percent margin, voters believe they will cause the United States to become even more dependent on foreign oil.

The Hill Poll showed the starkest difference of opinion on Obama’s policies between white and black voters.

On every question, a majority or plurality of white voters said they expected Obama’s policies to fail — while a majority or plurality of black voters expect them to succeed.

  • While 65 percent of whites said his policies would increase the debt, blacks by a 46-percent-to-39-percent margin said they would reduce it;
  • While 61 percent of whites said they expect gas prices to increase because of Obama’s policies, blacks by 42 percent to 29 percent expect them to drop;
  • While 50 percent of whites say unemployment will increase due to his policies, 72 percent of blacks say they think it will go down, and
  • While whites by a 47-percent-to-33-percent margin say Obama’s policies will make the United States more dependent on foreign oil imports, 68 percent of blacks say it will make the country less dependent.

The results also run contrary to indications that the economy is recovering more quickly and to other recent surveys showing the public is increasingly optimistic about its improvement.



She wants some free sh!t so she can keep her “SCRONG & IN-DEEP-IN-IT” status!!!!

“Somebody needs to be held accountable, and someone is going to have to pay for all of my kids.”

Here is an idea, stop fucking!!!

House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan details what the choice of two futures means: a path to debt and decline versus a stronger, more prosperous path of less debt, lower taxes, and greater opportunity for generations to come.



Big Journalism

I’ve been following the story of Michael John Kobulnicky, a reported former tea partier who stands accused of rape:

Lemon Grove resident Michael John Kobulnicky, 50, a leader in the San Diego Tea Party and former regional director of the Southern California Conservative Party, is under arrest for allegedly kidnapping and raping a local woman on Fiesta Island.

“He dragged her out of the car and sexually assaulted her pretty brutally,” San Diego Police Lt. Andra Brown told ECM news partner 10 News in late February, shortly after the February 25 assault occurred.

He is charged with rape, kidnapping, and forcible sex with a foreign object.  Evidence includes surveillance video shot at a local convenience store shortly before the kidnapping occurred.  Kobulnicky is being held without bail pending arraignment on Monday.

Despite media reports, his involvement in the San Diego Tea Party has been forcefully rejected:

What I find fascinating is that the some in the media wish to rush into reporting that a person is a “Tea Party Leader” or otherwise active member without fully vetting the subject whenever there is a potential criminal case.

A simple background check would have found that Kobulnicky essentially took a leave from the “San Diego Tea Party” in January and had neither interacted nor worked with them since that time.  Furthermore,  a fair-minded reporter who was well-informed about “Tea Party” activism would recognize that there are no “Tea Party Leaders”.  Some individuals may proclaim this status; however,  anyone following today’s citizen activism would be astute enough to view such claims with a healthy degree of skepticism.

This is a blatant example of the blatant double standard taken by some journalists.  There have been dozens of brutal rape cases associated with the “Occupy Wall Street” movement.  Specifically,  those crimes have occurred in camps during their designated protest activities.  Yet, many press reports have minimized brutality associated with the dozens of reports that are known.  And the news reports don’t try to paint the suspects as “Occupy Wall Street Leaders.”


Here are enough tits for a month:

Now quit bugging me for nothing but pics of tits!


Via NRO:

The credibility of President Obama’s “speak softly and carry a wet U.N. noodle” foreign policy took a major hit on Friday when it was discovered that Iranian thugs have been given carte blanche to participate in and wander around the U.N. Human Rights Council in Geneva intimidating Iranian dissidents.

The president’s decision to join the U.N.’s top human-rights body in 2009, and more recently to seek a second three-year term on the Council, is one of the centerpieces of his “engagement” strategy. Neither the membership of countries such as Saudi Arabia, Russia, China, and Cuba on this human-rights agency, nor three years of incessant Israel-bashing, has deterred the administration from attempting to legitimize the Council. It is not surprising, therefore, that Iran is evidently not feeling the heat. [...]

It turns out Iran also thought that by participating in the human-rights body it could import some of the tactics acceptable back home. On March 12, 2012, the U.N. was considering a report on human rights in Iran produced by a special rapporteur/investigator. Iranian dissidents were in attendance as observers. Just prior to the commencement of the so-called “interactive dialogue” between states and the investigator, U.N. security guards approached two dissidents and asked them to step outside for questioning. Iranian diplomats, the guards explained, had complained that the two had been taking photographs of Iranian representatives.

After their laptop was examined, the two NGO members were allowed to return to the Council session but shortly thereafter were approached by Iranian diplomats directly. A loud exchange occurred in the back of the Council chamber itself, with Iranian representatives insisting on examining the computer files of the Iranian NGOs. Ultimately, the diplomatic goons took out their cameras and photographed the NGO members inside the Council room. Despite the fact that multiple complaints over the harassment were lodged with U.N. officials, no U.N. action was taken.


New York Times: Quit the Catholic Church Over Mandate Opposition  Great article (this is not the New York Times, but about them running the pro-islamic ad).

Brent Bozell’s Follow-Up Letter to MSNBC President Phil Griffin, Demanding Griffin Fire Al Sharpton  You know Al will not be fired. MSNBC need him to keep their rabid liberals watching.

Thinning Down: Oprah Winfrey Network lays off one-fifth of staff  If Harpo had any sense, she would cut her losses and close her network down for good.

Apple says $60 billion will remain overseas until US tax law changes


This week, House Republicans will vote to repeal the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) provision of the president’s health care law. This board of 15 unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats would come between doctors and patients as they make health care decisions. This is irresponsible, dangerous, and harmful to our nation’s seniors. We’re working to reform Medicare–not blindly hack away at it.




You can wade through the various questions, and the ways in which they were asked, for yourself. The distillation?

Americans like these aspects of Obamacare -

- Extending the age which parents can keep their kids covered under their plan.

- Insurers cannot turn anyone down if they have pre-existing conditions.

That’s it. And the insurers say that these provisions are impossible to implement without a mandate. People would simply not buy insurance until they became catastrophically ill, and the insurers would be compelled by law to add them to the pools, poisoning the pool and skyrocketing costs for everyone.

They would also lose money because the amount of people who were “suddenly living at home with their parents” (in order to take advantage of the reduced family rate) would skyrocket overnight.

Without the individual mandate, which is wildly unpopular (and destined to be struck down by SCOTUS), insurers cannot provide insurance at a reasonable cost.

Obamacare is doomed. But so are we, because single payer is right around the corner… waiting patiently.

Oh, by the way, buried in this ABC story is something that I found interesting. The writer assumes Romney to be the GOP nominee as if it is already a done deal.