Click These

how to grow indoor cannabis
Nikola Tesla Secret Domain Registrations from just $3.98/Year
$2.95 .Com at GoDaddy.com!

Do Visit!

Follow Me

Nikola Tesla Secret

OBAMA REGIME WANTS TO KILL ONE OWL TO SAVE ANOTHER

Whoa. Today it is downright windy here in Iowa! Wife got up and when she opened the kitchen screen door the wind pushed that door so quick that the handle was yanked out of her hand and the chain that is supposed to stop the door from moving to far ripped right off! We went to the gym and with the wind hitting from one side (west side) of the van, it was fun keeping the van in the lane. After the gym, we went down to Osceola for grocery shopping. And I could see on the interstate the semi rigs just weaving in the wind. And yes, on the way there and the way back, I was damn mindful of the road and the wind wanting to push the van either off the road or into the other lane. Did make it home okay, but noticed the shed at the end of the parking lot where we all keep shovels, rakes, etc. Ripped to pieces! Oh, well. Only 35F and with a wind chill of 20! No sun, just very windy and cloudy. Not exactly a day to want to be up and about outside.

###

John McDonnell/TWP/TWP – A Barred Owl is shown near Mount Vernon, Va. To save the endangered spotted owl, the Obama administration is moving forward with a plan to shoot barred owls, a rival bird that has shoved its smaller cousin aside. The plan is the latest government attempt to protect the northern spotted owl, the meek, one-pound bird that sparked an epic battle over logging in the Pacific Northwest two decades ago.

This is what they want to save:

Now, PETA and other animal rights groups? They are silent as hell on this! But can you remember how they all went nuts when Bush proposed something like this? Just hypocrites on the left side when it comes to the Obama regime.

To save the imperiled spotted owl, the Obama administration is moving forward with a controversial plan to shoot barred owls, a rival bird that has shoved its smaller cousin aside.

The plan is the latest federal attempt to protect the northern spotted owl, the passive, one-pound bird that sparked an epic battle over logging in the Pacific Northwest two decades ago.

The government set aside millions of acres of forest to protect the owl, but the bird’s population continues to decline — a 40 percent slide in 25 years.

A plan announced Tuesday would designate habitat considered critical for the bird’s survival, while allowing logging to reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfire and to create jobs. Habitat loss and competition from barred owls are the biggest threats to the spotted owl.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar called the draft plan “a science-based approach to forestry that restores the health of our lands and wildlife and supports jobs and revenue for local communities.”

By removing selected barred owls and better managing forests, officials can give communities, foresters and land managers in three states important tools to promote healthier and more productive forests, Salazar said.

The new plan, which replaces a 2008 Bush administration plan that was tossed out in federal court, affects millions of acres of national, state and private forest land in Washington, Oregon and Northern California.

The plan to kill barred owls would not be the first time the federal government has authorized killing of one species to help another. California sea lions that feast on threatened salmon in the Columbia River have been killed in recent years after efforts to chase them away or scare them failed.

Read MORE.

(did not know really that our government kills so damn many animals and birds to help other birds and animals and fish. I find it a bit offsetting)

###

Can you freaking believe this shit?

The cremated remains of persons killed in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks at the Pentagon and of others who died in the crash of Flight 93 in Shanksville, Pa., were disposed of in a Virginia landfill, Defense Department officials said Tuesday.

An investigation by retired Army Gen. John Abizaid found that the mortuary at the Dover Air Force Base had acted inappropriately when it allowed “several portions of remains” from those killed on 9/11 to be taken to the landfill. Last year, the Air Force admitted that partial, unidentified remains of at least 274 troops killed in Afghanistan and Iraq were disposed of in landfills by the Dover mortuary.

Abizaid declined to estimate how many victims of the 9/11 attacks in Washington and Pennsylvania had their remains disposed of in a landfill. The remains were too badly incinerated or too small for DNA testing, officials said.

Read more

###

###

America 1950 vs. America 2012

Would you rather live in the America of 1950 or the America of 2012?  Has the United States changed for the better over the last 62 years?  Many fondly remember the 1950s and the 1960s as the “golden age” of America.

We emerged from World War II as the wealthiest and most powerful nation on the planet.  During that time period, just about anyone that wanted to get a job could find a job and the U.S. middle class expanded rapidly.  Back in 1950, America was still considered to be a “land of opportunity” and the economy was growing like crazy.  There was less crime, there was less divorce, the American people had much less debt and the world seemed a whole lot less crazy.  Most of the rest of the world deeply admired us and wanted to be more like us.  Of course there were a lot of things that were not great about America back in 1950, and there are many things that many of us dearly love that we would have to give up in order to go back and live during that time.  For example, there was no Internet back in 1950.  Instead of being able to go online and read the articles that you want to read, your news would have been almost entirely controlled by the big media companies of the day.  So there are definitely some advantages that we have today that they did not have back in 1950.  But not all of the changes have been for the better.  America is in a constant state of change, and many are deeply concerned about where all of these changes are taking us.

There has never been any society in the history of the world that has been perfect.  America was flawed in 1950 just as America is flawed today.

But that doesn’t mean that we should not reflect on how much things have changed over the past 62 years.

So which version of America would you rather live in?

America 1950 vs. America 2012 – you make the call….

Read it all HERE.

###

Just too damn funny not to post for you all to enjoy!

###

11 SUCCINCTLY PUT REASONS TO PULL YOUR KIDS OUT OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS

MSNBC’s Joan Walsh mocks Mormonism & Mitt Romney

Report: Israel’s security situation worst in decades

North Korea To Trade Nukes For Food

Is Salvadore Dali Running Our Afghan War Effort?

Obama’s Infanticide Votes

###

Another tattoed girl for those that like this stuff. But remember when only sailers and criminals got tattoos?

###

When will America realize that the infidel by any name is still an infidel?

We have poured trillions of dollars into Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Egypt, to say nothing of what is more precious than money — the blood of the brave men and women of the United States military. And for what?

To watch Iran’s influence permeate Iraq? To see the butcher of Teheran hold and raise hands with the propped-up presidents of Afghanistan and Pakistan? If there is a picture worth a billion words, that is it. That picture of Islamic unity is like using American sacrifice and tax dollars to jab a finger in America’s eye.

Some misguided policymakers in Washington, DC, actually think we can do good in Syria by supporting the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda types against Bashar al-Assad, the Shiite dictator and ally of Shiite Iran. Those policymakers will say we need to abide by our humanitarian principles and support the revolutionaries, regardless of their Islamic stripes.

However, helping one Islamic militant faction against another is a huge mistake. They know how to use America to serve their long-term purposes, and the ultimate outcome will backfire against us just like it did in Egypt and Libya.

Read the article here.

###

LYON, France – Interpol has arrested 25 suspected members of the Anonymous hackers group in a swoop covering more than a dozen cities in Europe and Latin America, the global police body said Tuesday.

“Operation Unmask was launched in mid-February following a series of coordinated cyber-attacks originating from Argentina, Chile, Colombia and Spain,” Interpol said.

The statement cited attacks on the websites of the Colombian Ministry of Defense and the presidency, as well as on Chile’s Endesa electricity company and its National Library, among others.

The operation was carried out by police from Argentina, Chile, Colombia and Spain, the statement said, with 250 items of computer equipment and cell phones seized in raids on 40 premises in 15 cities.

Police also seized credit cards and cash from the suspects, aged 17 to 40.

“This operation shows that crime in the virtual world does have real consequences for those involved, and that the Internet cannot be seen as a safe haven for criminal activity,” said Bernd Rossbach, acting director of police services at Interpol, which is in the French city of Lyon.

READ MORE HERE

###

By Bill Wilson — Speaking to the National Governors Association, Barack Obama implored governors from across the country to stop cutting spending: “Too many states are making cuts that I think are too big. Budgets are by choice, so today I’m calling on all of you: invest more in education, invest more in our children.”

What’s he talking about? According to the National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO), spending at the state level has increased every single year in recent memory. It rose from $945.3 billion in 2000 to some $1.69 trillion in 2011.

Even in the recession, spending increases have continued unabated, growing by about $63 billion a year since Fiscal Year (FY) 2008, according to NASBO data.

And in Obama’s pet area of education, spending too has risen. In 2007, $305.79 billion was spent on elementary and secondary education by the states, and $145.93 billion on higher education, a total of more than $452 billion. In 2011, that had risen to $509.42 billion.

There was a slight reduction in elementary and secondary education in 2010 of about $2.15 billion. But much of that included $5.6 billion of such cuts in the bankrupt Democrat-controlled state of California alone, which was offset by spending increases elsewhere.
See MORE

###

In this election cycle, one noticeable phenomenon is how the Republican presidential candidates are emphasizing our country’s founding principles — liberty and freedom — more than in any campaign in the modern political era. Each speaks often of the Declaration of Independence. Citing articles of the Constitution is commonplace.

The president’s record of evoking such themes stands in stark contrast. In his State of the Union address, for example, our president made only one perfunctory reference to the Constitution and then went on to misquote it.

In his campaign speeches, the president carefully co-opts key Republican themes like reducing debt and deficits, exploiting natural gas, making teachers accountable and reducing regulation. Yet, in these acts of political triangulation, he sees no value in pre-empting Republican rivals on basic American principles imbedded in our founding documents.

An Internet search for examples of Obama advocating for liberty and economic freedom is futile. They don’t exist. Odd for man who was once a professor of constitutional law.

So, why is the president so silent while his adversaries are so vocal?

The answer lies in the president’s own words. In the 2008 campaign he said he was seeking to “fundamentally transform” America. Indeed he is, and this transformation is directed squarely at American Exceptionalism.

The Declaration of Independence was the original American Social Contract. In it, the detail of King George’s “abuses and usurpations” laid the predicate for our Exceptionalism in a simple and provocative formula the world had never experienced:

Power would reside with commoners, not kings. The people’s representatives would be entrusted with it. Government would be limited and lent to representatives, not vested, with payment on the loan due periodically via elections. Limited government, principally for national protection, would free individuals to pursue their dreams as they wished, and the collective pursuit of these individual dreams would create a great and prosperous nation.

The Contract’s counterparties are the government and the governed; it has no legal authority; its validity is derived from the Creator; and the terms of the Contract are simple: power is lent in return for accountability back to the lender, the people.

Read the article here.

###

Are you on Twitter? If so, follow me. If you have no idea what twitter is, I finally found a good visual explanation.

 

Comments are closed.