Again, this goes back to earlier post about why no journalist is actually fact checking everything about sandy hook. So how can these pages be created BEFORE the incident happened? I am not into conspiracies but this gets me to thinking that someone, somewhere, planned this massacre! Just like the shootings at Aurora!
In addition to the the odd behavior of Robbie Parker, dad of a Sandy Hook child victim; professional crisis actors simulating mass casualty events; those doppleganger photos of parents; and the refusal by authorities to make public the school’s surveillance video, here’s more “make crazy” weirdness about the Sandy Hook massacre.
We now know of three condolence/donation websites and pages that were created 1-3 days BEFORE the massacre.
1. R.I.P. Victoria Soto Facebook Page
Victoria Soto was a teacher at Sandy Hook Elementary School who was killed that terrible morning of December 14, 2012.
Soto’s friends and family (presumably) created a touching “Rest In Peace Victoria Soto” Facebook page.
JOURNALISTS CONFUSE GLOCKS and 1911?s and OTHER MSM STUPIDITY
Gun Control has once again earned major time in the media. What the MSM calls a debate is actually pushing through their twisted agenda. They don’t bother to get both sides of the story, nor do the bother with facts. They do not understand guns and make no effort to learn. Here is a perfect example off the New York Times web site:
They call this a Glock .40. What the hell is a Glock .40? Can you believe that? If you are so stupid that you can’t tell the difference between a Glock and a 1911 should you really be reporting on guns? The liberal left of America accepts everything this group of journalist dumbasses sells them and it never occurs to them to question the truth. I got into a debate the other day with a guy that felt we should ban those bad AR-15?s because they are really ‘Assault Rifle Machine guns and they can shoot through way to much ammo in their clip’.
How is it possible to have that much ignorance wrapped up into one sentence? When I asked him where he got the idea the AR was an Assault Rifle he gave me a condescending look and said …. Uh … it’s in the name, AR – Assault Rifle. He never did apologize when I informed him that the AR stood for Armalite Rifle. He didn’t know the difference between an automatic and a semi-automatic gun either. He proudly informed me that he got his information off the news.
WTF? The UN, known as the useless nations, dictates to the USA how much of their budget we will pay? And some asshole rep of ours to this islamic asshole collection of useless nations says it could be worse?
U.S. taxpayers should not be ‘very pleased’ to pay more than one fifth of U.N. budget
In the midst of the fiscal cliff panic, which dominated the American media cycle during the holiday season, another very important debate over the use of the United States’ finances was talking place in the international community at the United Nations. At the end of December, the United Nations General Assembly decided that the U.S. would continue to pay more than one fifth of the world organization’s budget for the next three years.
In response to the legislation, U.S. representative for U.N. management and reform, Joseph Torsella, said taxpayers should be satisfied with the U.N’s decision, pointing out that it could have been worse – the U.N. could have demanded a higher contribution from taxpayers.
CNSNews.com reported that Torsella said the U.S. is “very pleased” to maintain its 22 percent limit on contributions to the U.N. budget and noted how the decision will save $300 million each year for regular and peacekeeping budgets thanks to the vote not to increase the U.S. contribution allowance.
Torsella’s statement puts little faith in taxpayers’ ability to spot a bad deal like this one.