The Only Thing You Need To Read About All The New Apple Stuff

Published September 12, 2012 | By Iowadawg

Remember now, our GDP will be increased if you all buy the new apple iphone 5. So here is the only thing you need to read about all the new apple stuff.

Sooooo yes, there’s a new iPhone today. It’s called the iPhone 5:

The main difference is that it’s got a taller screen:

Now go here for more pictures and more explanations of all this new apple stuff (disclaimer, as apple does not pay me one cent, I refuse to buy their products).

Go HERE.

###

$3.82 Billlion Dollars Slated For Egypt’s Brotherhood

Romney And Congress Must Nip The $3.82 Billlion Dollars Nourishing Egypt’s Brotherhood’s Vile Fruits

Egypt expects to receive $3.85 billion dollars in US cash supported by Obama. My prior post concerning the financial bailout of Egypt described this as throwing money in a bottomless hole. $2 Billion dollars is in military aid and the rest in government bailout funds. It’s time for Congress to cut off all funding unless there are immediate arrests and punishments for all involved in burning the US Embassy. Only a stupid fool or a guilt-ridden sympathizer would fund this Egyptian misconduct.

More here.

###

After 11 years years of rigid stoicism, Muslim outrage was finally
in evidence on a 9/11 anniversary… not that the mass murder of
3,000 innocents in the name of Islam had anything to do with it.
Apparently, someone said something offensive about their religion
- and Muslims worked through their hurt feelings by killing more
Americans and raising the al-Qaeda flag over the US embassy.

From HERE, so do go and check out this blog.

###

An Economic ‘Plan’?

The myth that the president creates the recovery is wrong — and dangerous.

Former president Bill Clinton told the Democratic National Convention that Barack Obama has a plan to rescue the economy, and only the fact that the Republicans stood in his way has stopped him from getting the economy out of the doldrums.

From all this, and much else that is said in the media and on the campaign trail, you might think that the economy requires government intervention to revive and create jobs. It is Beltway dogma that the government has to “do something.”

History tells a different story. For the first 150 years of this country’s existence, the federal government felt no great need to “do something” when the economy turned down. Over that long span of time, the economic downturns were neither as deep nor as long-lasting as they have been since the federal government decided that it had to “do something” in the wake of the stock-market crash of 1929, which set a new precedent.

One of the last of the “do nothing” presidents was Warren G. Harding. In 1921, under President Harding, unemployment hit 11.7 percent — higher than it has been under President Obama. Harding did nothing to get the economy stimulated.

Far from spending more money to try to “jump-start” the economy, President Harding actually reduced government spending, as the tax revenues declined during the economic downturn.

This was not a matter of absent-mindedly neglecting the economy. President Harding deliberately rejected the urging of his own Secretary of Commerce, Herbert Hoover, to intervene.

The 11.7 percent unemployment rate in 1921 fell to 6.7 percent in 1922, and then to 2.4 percent in 1923. It is hard to think of any government intervention in the economy that produced such a sharp and swift reduction in unemployment as was produced by just staying out of the way and letting the economy rebound on its own.

Bill Clinton loudly proclaimed to the delegates to the Democratic National Convention that no president could have gotten us out of the recession in just one term.

But history shows that the economy rebounded out of a worse unemployment situation in just two years under Harding, who simply let the market revive on its own, as it had done before, time and time again for more than a century.

Something similar happened under Ronald Reagan. Unemployment peaked at 9.7 percent early in the Reagan administration. Like Harding and earlier presidents, Reagan did nothing, despite outraged outcries in the media.

The economy once again revived on its own. Three years later, unemployment was down to 7.2 percent — and it kept on falling, as the country experienced 20 years of economic growth with low inflation and low unemployment.

The Obama party line is that all the bad things are due to what he inherited from Bush, and the few signs of recovery are due to Obama’s policies beginning to pay off. But if the economy has been rebounding on its own for more than 150 years, the question is why it has been so slow to recover under the Obama administration.

The endless proliferation of anti-business interventions by government, and the sight of more of the same coming over the horizon from Barack Obama’s appointees in the federal bureaucracies, creates the one thing that has long stifled economic activity in countries around the world — uncertainty about what the rules of the game are, and the unpredictability of how specifically those rules will continue to change in a hostile political environment.

Both history and contemporary data show that countries prosper more when there are stable and dependable rules, under which people can make investments without having to fear unpredictable new government interventions before these investments can pay off.

A great myth has grown up that President Franklin D. Roosevelt saved the American economy with his interventions during the Great Depression of the 1930s. But a 2004 economic study concluded that government interventions had prolonged the Great Depression by several years. Obama is repeating policies that failed under FDR.

Despite demands that Mitt Romney spell out his plan for reviving the economy, we can only hope that Governor Romney plans to stop the government from intervening in the economy and gumming up the works, so that the economy can recover on its own.

From NRO. Another site you go to often if not daily and read all there is there.

###

Almost….get the story from the Navy Times

The first one is real…

Go to the Looking Spoon for much, much more!

###

This is our freaking liberals assholes! Telling us we need to play nice with those freaking islamics! You know, the ones that burn down synagogues, churches, kill christians, behead little kids, that sort of stuff. I say screw every freaking asshole muslim in the world. You don’t like our free speech? Then die and burn in hell. Along with your false god mohammed.

###

Read it all HERE.

###

Holy shit people! This is the freaking movie that islamics are pissed off about and thus killing Americans! And demanding our president (who probably will bend over) put the ones responsible for this movie on trial, into jail, kill them, whatever it takes to make the camel suckers happy!

###

Obama Rewrites Full-Time Employment Definition

A year and a half after the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, bureaucrats at the IRS and Health and Human Services issued an 18-page report outlining new regulations that will dramatically increase health care costs for small and large businesses alike.

The regulations, written by an IRS attorney, arbitrarily redefine “full time employee” as someone who works 30 hours a week for a business. Traditionally, most private businesses have defined “full time employee” as someone who works 40 hours a week. With this new regulation, the federal government is now removing the right of businesses to define “full time employee” as they deem appropriate for their unique conditions.

###

Got this from facebook, then followed up with the next one from HERE.

###

Dethrone the EPA

The choice: Prosperity through liberty, or depression through strangulation.

The current presidential campaign hinges on jobs and the economy. Yet most of the debate has centered on peripheral issues such as the Bush tax cut, when there is a Tyrannosaurus in the room that is being virtually ignored. That monster is the EPA.

The EPA is today the primary enemy of economic growth in the United States, and through it the world. The damage that it has done, is doing, and threatens to do in the future is immense. Virtually since its birth in 1970, the agency has committed one atrocity after another. As one of its first acts after coming into existence, the EPA banned the vital pesticide DDT. (This was done is direct defiance of the investigatory court findings of federal judge Edmund Sweeney, which showed that DDT was not a danger to humans or wildlife.) As a result, large regions of Africa and Asia were given over to malaria-spreading mosquitoes, killing tens of millions of people and aborting economic development.

Read it all HERE.

###