Every single day, I read more and more about muslims in this country trying their best to ruin our country. Wanting to implement sharia law, disobeying our laws, and freaking ass liberals giving them a pass at every opportunity. Now get this, if a white man spoke out that muslims have to be obeying our laws or get thrown in jail, deported, or hung, I bet you that the government, the liberals, would arrest this white man and accuse him of so many crimes. But muslims can say the following and get away with it!
Dearborn Muslim calls for killing anti-Islam protesters
Sharia mandates death for those who criticize Islam, and other Sharia provisions are coming to Dearborn, so why not this one? Will Dearborn authorities investigate Aboudi Berro? Don’t hold your breath.
“Dearborn Muslim Calls for Killing Anti-Islam Protesters,” by David Wood at Answering Muslims, February 10:
A recent Dearborn Patch article addressed concerns about the location of the annual Dearborn Arab Festival. For several years, the festival has been held on Warren Avenue. However, because the sidewalks adjacent to the festival remain public property during the event, criticism and protest are protected by the First Amendment. In 2012, a group of anti-Islam protesters showed up with signs condemning Muhammad (not to mention a pig’s head on pole), and some young Muslims responded violently. Mayor John O’Reilly, a notorious defender of the city’s campaign against free speech, hopes that organizers will consider moving the festival to a closed location, where the city will not be responsible for handling protesters.
Of course, the only reason protesters show up at the festival is that Dearborn leaders (with occasional help from the American Arab Chamber of Commerce) spent years violating the Constitutional rights of U.S. citizens. I attended the Arab Festival in 2008 and 2009, and I didn’t see any protesters. In 2009, however, the Police Department declared that Christians wouldn’t be allowed to distribute pamphlets or Bibles, even on the public sidewalks around the festival. This was the same year we were attacked by security for asking a question at a booth that invited us to ask questions. The following year, we were arrested for having a peaceful discussion with some Muslim teenagers who approached us with questions about Christianity. Two days later, police took us into custody again for attempting to distribute Bibles outside the festival. News
(and videos) spread about Dearborn’s contempt for the First Amendment, and this drew a number of protesters to the city (including Terry Jones, who was convicted and jailed for planning to protest outside a mosque). Now that the city has gained worldwide attention for its stance against free speech, city leaders want to move the festival in order to escape the consequences of their actions.
The local population is divided over whether to move the festival, and, even more importantly, over how Muslims should respond to protesters. The Dearborn Area Community Members Facebook group hosted a discussion about the move, and some of the comments were enlightening. A Muslim named Aboudi Berro suggested moving the festival to an area where protesters could be more easily murdered:
Read it all.
I found the above HERE.
Why all non-muslims should read about asswipes like this, at that site and at Creeping Sharia and Bare Naked Islam.
Liberals Rush to Defend Murderer Christopher Dorner; “A True Patriot Hero“.
The Left’s Soft Treatment of a Cop-Killer.
LA Police to Reopen Case Into Firing of Mass-Murdering Former Cop.
Too good to check: CNN anchor blames asteroid on global warming. I am of the opinion that CNN and the rest of the liberal media hire people based on their stupidity!
What Would Happen if the Government Banned Firearms and Tried to Confiscate Our Guns?
Unreal… Nancy Pelosi: It’s Almost a False Argument to Say US Has a Spending Problem.
Dick Durbin Admits the Obama Sequestration Was “Designed as a Budget Threat, Not a Budget Strategy” (VIdeo).
LGBTQIA: the expanding gender agenda
February 6, 2013 (Mercatornet.com) – Last month The New York Times published an article on the latest expansion of sexual identity among students at progressive universities in the United States. LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) no longer covers it, according to a handful of students who seem to have nothing better to do than reinvent themselves. “Generation LGBTQIA” want recognition for queer, intersex and asexual proclivities as well. According to the Times, this list by no means is final but continually being added to as students “move beyond the binary of male/female”, heterosexual/homosexual and reject the normal.
Most people are unaware of the inroads made by gender theory — the ideology that has produced “Generation LBGTQIA” — or of the dangers it presents. Part of the confusion lies in the fact that there are several different theories of gender each of which is based on a false understanding of the human person. The various theories — the gender perspective, gender identity and expression, and gender queer — are not logically consistent and are continually changing, making it difficult for those who try to critique them.
The term “gender” has become ubiquitous. The forms we routinely fill out, which previously asked for our sex, now asked for our gender. Most people assumed that gender was simply a polite synonym for sex – preferable since sex has a secondary meaning, namely as a shortened form for sexual intercourse. But those pushing the use of “gender” did not do so out of an over-scrupulous sense of propriety, for them gender and sex are not synonyms.
Continue reading at LifeSiteNews.